Public Administration Vs Private Administration

Most authors differentiate public administration andobscurity, the public manager must operate in the public
private administration by educational institutions (publiceye. His or her actions are constantly subjected to
schools vs. private schools). Although it's a goodpublic scrutiny. (Denhardt) The publicness of the work
example to provide a comprehensive analysisof the public manager doesn't end in merely carrying
between the two sectors, I found it not theout public policy, the public manager has to respond to
quintessence for a comparative analysis. Historically, inthe demands of the public. Denhardt speaks of the
our country, public schools have a much higher quality"inevitable tension" between efficiency and
education than private schools, and studyingresponsiveness, the pressure to manage effectively
economics and public administration, it is not just theand to be simultaneously responsive to public
nature of bureaucracies, nor the scope of publicconcerns. This pressure often leaves public
administration that the case today was reversed.organizations in a "no-win" situation, trying to serve a
While some authors identified over a dozen factorspublic that demands effective government but balks at
that differentiates public to private administration,paying for it (taxes). The public also demands
Denhardt only speaks of the three fundamentalaccountability in government, an assurance that those
differences between the two. In this paper, I wouldwho formulate, implement and administer public
elaborate Denhardt's three points since, together withprograms will act responsibly.
economist Boadway's Difference between Public andOne quality that makes public sector different from
Private Sector, I found these as the most undisputableprivate is in the form of unit analysis. (Boadway) Apart
and concrete comparisons.from publicly owned-companies, most public institutions
The most apparent difference between the twoare part of a larger chain of command and control
sectors is their organizing principles or goal. (Denhardt)where it is harder to draw a line between the different
While private administration has a definite mission,parts of the system- and where legal frameworks
which is the pursuit of profit or stability or growth ofprovide little help in this. For instance: public agencies-
revenues, public administration, on the other hand, haslike research councils or directorates of health- interact
ambiguous purposes. Furthermore, the dilemma inclosely with ministries as well as subordinate institution
ambiguity of purposes is exacerbated by too manyand "users". The innovation activities in these institutions
unnecessary and inoperable agencies, with purposesare heavily influenced by decisions made above and
that overlap and bloated bureaucracies. One might saybelow the chain of commands. The closest parallel to
that the goal of public administration is to enact publicprivate sector will be large conglomerates or
policies, but the overlapping and the main ambiguity ofmultinational companies. The complex system of
most of these policies, and the vagueness of theorganizations with various (and to some extent
enactment of these policies make publicconflicting) tasks, is one of the reasons for the
administration's purpose to be more ambiguous.inefficiency of public administration. Although, some
Nevertheless, the fact that public institutions are notauthors in public administration, such Woodrow Wilson
profit driven, should not lead us to believe that publicin The Study of Public Administration, where he
sector employees and managers are not concernedreiterated that the evolution of public administration
about financial matters. As is the case with privatetogether with its complex system and increasing
companies, public sector units and organizations fightnumber of bureaucracies is to complement the
for funding and influence.population growth, but a population with sufficient
Another factor that makes the public sector differentnumber of agencies to manage them and with high
from the private is decision making. (Denhradt) In publicmarginal productivity for each public employee, is
administration, the decision must be and should bebetter than a bloated bureaucracy with little or zero
pluralistic. The founding fathers intentionally created amarginal productivity, and worse, unnecessary and
democratic republic where all key decisions are maderedundant purpose.
in politicized environment. This allows for maximumLastly, although political aspect is both apparent in public
participation: open debate, multiple veto points - aand private sector, political aspect is more important in
decision making hierarchy where consensus must bethe public than in the private sector. Policy decisions
achieved at each level, ideally, an informed decision.normally affect companies directly and indirectly,
While private administration's decision-making is muchthrough laws, regulations and financial support. The
more simple- it's monopolistic or close to monopolistic.public sector is at least formally controlled by elected
This type of decision-making would avoid any conflictspoliticians. The intimate link between this governance
in interest; hence, the goal is clearly defined.dimension and funding of current expenses of the
The visibility of public administrators is another notableactivities implies a very strong link between ownership
difference between public and private sector. While aand control on the one hand and the growth strategies
manager in a private business may work in relativeof the subsidiary organizations.