Brazil's Largest Ever Economic Growth Programme

This short article discusses the two stages of Brazil'spublically stated his dissatisfaction: "I'm not happy with
Programa de Aceleração do Crescimentowhat we have done so far, the poor people of this
('Growth Acceleration Programme', also known ascountry needs us to do more and the economy needs
'PAC'). Aimed at assisting the country's economicto happen." More pressure was subsequently put on
progression, the PAC is mainly focused aroundstate heads and municipality governments to carry out
improving Brazil's infrastructure through a variety ofprojects efficiently within set timeframes. Despite
means.these issues, the overall impact of the PAC-1 has been
*** PAC-1 (Programa de Aceleração doviewed as a positive step for Brazil from all sections
Crescimento 1 / Growth Acceleration Programmeof society. Launched amidst the global economic crisis,
One) ***many have cited the programme as a major
Initiated on 28th January 2007, the PAC-1 was builtcontributory factor which assisted in Brazil's excelled
around a four year implementation strategy, composedrecovery - particularly as a result of the increased
of five levels, in order of priority:employment opportunities and company subsidies.
1) Infrastructural measures largely focused around*** PAC-2 (Programa de Aceleração do
energy (via the means of interest payment reductionsCrescimento 2 / Growth Acceleration Programme
as well as gas industry subsidies and tax reliefs);Two) ***
transportation (roads, highways, ports, airports, urbanIn March 2010, phase two of the Growth Acceleration
transport), housing and sanitation;Programme was launched with an infrastructure
2) Measures to encourage credit and financing;investment plan of R$ 958.8 billion for use between
3) Better environmental regulatory frameworks;2011 and 2014. Funded via a combination of private,
4) Tax relief, particularly aimed at the poorer ends ofstate, federal and municipal investment, the allocation is
society;as follows:
5) Fiscal measures for the long term.Melhores Cidades ('Better Cities') - with an investment
The aim of the $R 513 billion programme was, in turn,of R$ 57.1 billion, the aim is to improve the quality of life
to accelerate private investment and was allocated inin Brazil's major cities with a focus on sanitation, urban
the following directions:mobility, pavement improvements and decreasing
Energia ('Energy') - out of a total of R$ 274.8 billion, R$crime.
179.0 billion was invested in natural gases and oil; R $ $Cidadania da Comunidade ('Community Citizenship') -
65.9 billion in power generation; R$ 17.4 billion inan investment of R$ 23 billion aimed at augmenting the
renewable fuels and R$ 12.5 billion in electricityaccessibility of state services in the country's poorer
transportation.regions including various health services, emergency
Melhorias Infraestrutura Social e Urbana ('Socialcare units, day care centres, pre-schools, sporting
Infrastructure and Urban Improvements') - out of afacilities and community police stations.
total of R$ 170.8 billion, R$ 106.3 billion was invested inMinha Casa, Minha Vida ('My House, My Life') -
housing improving projects (with majority allocated incontinuing the established programme of reducing the
lower class areas); R$ 40 billion in basic sanitation; R$country's housing deficit, providing construction sector
12.7 billion in water system improvements; R$8.7 billionincentives and generating jobs with an investment of
on the Luz Para Todos programme ('Light for All',R$ 278.2 billion.
which entitles households in rural areas to get a freeÁgua e Luz para Todos ('Water and Light for All') - a
spot light per room with electricity two sockets) andR$30.6 billion investment with the objective of
R$ 3.1 billion on improving subway systems (particularlycontinuing the programme of free access to lighting for
in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo).poorer communities as well as the provision of
Transporte Logística ('Transport Logistics') - out of aimproved water supply and resources.
total of R$ 58.3 billion, R$33.4 billion was invested in theTransporte ('Transportation') - an investment of $R 4.5
country's highways; R$ 10.6 billion in the merchant navy;billion to continue the work of the PAC-1 in improving,
R$ 7.9 billion in railways; R$ 3 billion in airportexpanding and integrating a logistical network of quality
infrastructure; R$ 2.7 billion in ports and R$ 700 millionand safety of Brazil's roads, railways, ports,
on public waterways.waterways and airports.
Shortly after the introduction of the programme, aEnergia ('Energy') - with the largest investment of R$
sub-project entitled PAC das Crianças ('PAC for627.1 billion the funding is aimed at continuing the
Children') was also launched focused at addressing thecountry's leading global status of producing clean and
fundamental causes of violence against children andrenewable sources of energy; supporting the
adolescents. R$ 2.9 billion was allocated to renovateproduction of oil (mainly in the country's south east
and construct 49 buildings to house young people incoast); electricity efficiency; shipbuilding investments
this predicament supported by counselling, educationaland mineral research.
programmes, sporting academies, libraries, workshopsPAC-2 was accused of being a means of President
and clinics. In conjunction with this, a programme wasLula's Workers Party to gain votes for the 2010
created to pass a one-off grant to families to bringelections referring to the fact that the programme
back their abandoned children (an unfortunateshould not have been started when the first part was
consequence in the poorer parts of the country). Thenot fully implemented. Worker Party government
source of the funding for PAC-1 largely came fromofficials were quick to dismiss the programmes critics
both state enterprises (including an investment bymaintaining that Brazil is in need for these infrastructural
Petrobras of R$ 148.7 billion) and the private sector asimprovements and the main concern should be with
well as a proportion from fiscal and social securityregards to the successive effects on inflation that the
receipts.various parts of the programme will cause. It has
The main criticism the programme has attracted hastherefore become clear that the government needs to
been with regards to its slow implementation: at thekeep close eye on controlling runaway price rises in
target completion date of March 2010, 63 percent oforder to solidify the country's long term growth and
the funding was spent. At the time, President Lulamaximise the effects of the programme.